Sarah
Ranch Hand
Posts: 528
|
Post by Sarah on Apr 27, 2005 17:43:03 GMT -5
That the low alert fairies did that ? LOL
|
|
Sarah
Ranch Hand
Posts: 528
|
Post by Sarah on Apr 27, 2005 17:44:50 GMT -5
oh, it may have been a good thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heather T on Apr 27, 2005 18:42:20 GMT -5
It actually went off a couple times last night. Don't know who sent it. Ben will be putting passwords on that one next, but I truly do think it should be the owner of the horse that posts a low alert. A high alert is easy to figure out, but the low alert is usually only known by the owner.
|
|
Claire
Global Moderator
Posts: 1,030
|
Post by Claire on Apr 27, 2005 21:20:41 GMT -5
Heather I totally agree with you about the low alert needing some sort of control. Way too many false ones being sent out----LOL look at poor Copper I think she broke the record for the most low alerts before foaling.
|
|
Barbara
Outhouse Monitor
Posts: 157
|
Post by Barbara on Apr 30, 2005 20:35:21 GMT -5
LOL. The "problem" with Copper was that some people didn't realize the cam view was switching regularly, and they thought she was constantly doing laps around the stall. Funny!
I remember when the alerts were new and someone admitted on a message board that she hit High Alert thinking she was telling it to send an alert to her when the time came - then decided it was a test button and tried it again to listen again.
It would be nice if the owners had the option of password-protecting the Low Alerts too.
Some mares have moved so fast that the owner didn't have time to hit High before leaving for the barn, and the Lows done by watchers were the only ones posted. If I see a sac or feet and the High hasn't been signaled, I hit Low. Better than nothing for people who really want a chance to see the foaling.
|
|
